No Longer Saying Ambiguously "XX is Good"

• After understanding the difference between Normative Discussion and Descriptive Discussion in the Bajiro Seminar, I have come to believe that Ethics.
• As a result, I feel like I have stopped making ambiguous statements like “XX is good” recently.
  • I say things like “the image quality is good” because we can clearly define and share the criteria for “good” in that case.
  • However, I have stopped saying things like “XX is good” when the criteria for “good” is ambiguous or cannot be shared.
    • I now have a mental barrier called Ethics before writing such statements.
    • If I think about it carefully, I should be saying “good” in the sense of “serving some higher purpose and being useful for it.”
      • I tend to write it exactly as it is.
    • Alternatively, I think there are cases where it is just a matter of belief without any higher purpose beyond it.
  • Examples:
    • 63c5e74079e11300000f7989
      • I don’t say “the power to leave the comfort zone is good.”
      • I write that it is useful for Living in a Way that Clears the Fog of the World.
    • 63c5e05f79e1130000fac257
      • I don’t say ”Living in a Way that Clears the Fog of the World is good.”
      • I only describe the feeling of believing in it.
        • I can’t say more than that, I think.